Philips CPAP Lawsuit

Philips CPAP Lawsuit

In June of 2021, Philips Respironics announced a recall for sleep apnea machine models that may increase the risk of developing lung cancer, kidney cancer, liver cancer, and other forms of cancer. The affected products include continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machines, Bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) machines, and mechanical ventilators designed to help people with breathing disorders, including sleep apnea. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) identified the Philips Respironics recall as the agency’s most serious (Class I).

The Philips recall affects millions of people who rely on these machines to help them with breathing disorders. According to Philips, roughly 80% of the affected products are CPAP machines for people with sleep apnea. Shocked by the news that these products may be linked to cancer and a host of other serious health issues, many are turning to the courts to seek damages against Philips for putting a defective and dangerous product on the market.

What Caused the Philips CPAP Recall?

Philips Respironics cited a serious problem with the polyester-based polyurethane foam that dampens the sound and vibration when the machines are in use. The foam can break down and release small chemical particles into the machine’s airway, which can then be inhaled or ingested. According to the FDA, particulate exposure from Philips sleep apnea machines may have “toxic or carcinogenic effects to organs, such as kidneys and liver.”

CPAP Class Action Lawyers

If you or someone in your family developed cancer after using any of the Philips Respironics CPAP machines, BiPAP machines, or ventilators listed below, you may be eligible to pursue justice and compensation in a lawsuit against the manufacturer. CPAP lawyers represent victims on a contingency fee basis, which means the attorneys only get paid if your case ends in a successful verdict or settlement. If for some reason the litigation does not result in compensation, you would not owe anything.

To learn more about your legal rights and see if you qualify for a CPAP lawsuit, fill out our case evaluation form below or call us at (855) 948-5098.

Contact Us

  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter the age of the patient.
  • Please enter the age of the patient.
  • Please enter your symptoms.
  • Please describe your experience.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please enter your primary phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your city.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter your zip code.
    This isn't a valid zip cide.
  • Please make a selection.

Which CPAP Machines Did Philips Recall?

According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the following Philips CPAP machines, BiPAP machines, and ventilators have been recalled:

Recalled CPAP and BiPAP Products:

C-Series ASV

C-Series S/T and AVAPS

Dorma 400

Dorma 500

DreamStation

DreamStation ASV

DreamStation Go

DreamStation ST, AVAPS

E30 (Emergency Use Authorization)

OmniLab Advanced+

REMstar SE Auto

SystemOne (Q-Series)

SystemOne ASV4

Recalled Ventilators:

A-Series BiPAP A30

A-Series BiPAP A40

A-Series BiPAP Hybrid A30*

A-Series BiPAP V30 Auto

Garbin Plus, Aeris, LifeVent

Trilogy 100

Trilogy 200

*not marketed in the U.S.

Why Are CPAP Sleep Apnea Machines Recalled?

Philips determined a recall was appropriate after receiving user reports and conducting lab testing on several CPAP, BiPAP, and ventilators, including the widely-used Philips DreamStation. The company found that the polyester-based polyurethane (PE-PUR) sound abatement foam used in Philips sleep machines can degrade and deteriorate over time, which can cause people who rely on these machines for breathing assistance to inhale or ingest small particles or gas.

Inhaling or ingesting PE-PUR particulate can cause a host of health issues. Philips has already acknowledged that the risks of particulate exposure include:

  • Adverse effects to kidneys and liver
  • Asthma
  • Headache
  • Inflammatory response
  • Irritation (eye, respiratory tract, and skin)
  • Respiratory issues
  • Toxic carcinogenic effects

According to Philips, the foam degradation may worsen in certain conditions, including higher temperatures and humidity, and the use of unapproved cleaning methods (including ozone).

Class-Action Lawsuit Alleges Philips Knew for Years That CPAP Machines Were Dangerous

Shortly after the FDA CPAP recall, a class-action lawsuit was filed alleging Philips knew that its CPAP machines were dangerous years before the company decided to issue its recall. The class-action alleges that numerous people had complained to Philips in the years before the recall noting that they found “black particles” in their sleep machines, including the company’s flagship DreamStation line of CPAP machines.

Rather than issuing a warning to consumers, the class-action lawsuit alleges that Philips continued to sell its line of CPAP, BiPAP, and ventilators until it could launch a new generation of CPAP, BiPAP, and ventilator machines to replace the recalled machines. Considering how many people rely on these machines each and every day, our law firm is appalled by Phillips’ alleged actions.

CPAP Lawsuit FAQ

What is a CPAP Machine?

CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) machines are medical devices used to treat people with obstructive sleep apnea. CPAP sleep machines send a steady flow of oxygen to the nose and mouth, keeping the airway open and allowing the patient to breathe normally. CPAP machines have motors that generate oxygen, which travels through a filter and a flexible tube before reaching the mask, sealed around the patient’s nose and mouth.

What is the Difference Between CPAP and BiPAP?

They may look similar, but BiPAP (bilateral positive airway pressure) machines differ from CPAP machines. BiPAP machines are more complex than CPAP machines in that they have two pressures (inhalation and exhalation) compared to the CPAP’s one pressure. BiPAP therapy is the preferred treatment method for people who do not respond to CPAP therapy, including those with central sleep apnea, complex sleep apnea, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). BiPAP machines are generally more expensive than CPAP machines, so many people who can be treated by either choose CPAP instead of BiPAP.

What is Sleep Apnea?

Sleep apnea is a serious sleeping disorder where a person’s breathing repeatedly starts and stops. It is the most common sleeping disorder in the U.S.

There are three types of sleep apnea:

  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea – Obstructive sleep apnea happens when an individual’s throat muscles intermittently relax, blocking the airway during sleep. It is the most common type of sleep apnea, affecting an estimated one in 15 people in the U.S.
  • Central Sleep Apnea – Central sleep apnea happens when an individual’s brain does not send the proper messages to the muscles that control breathing. This study estimates that .9% of people over 40 have central sleep apnea.
  • Complex Sleep Apnea Syndrome – Complex sleep apnea, also known as treatment-emergent central sleep apnea, occurs when a person presents with both obstructive sleep apnea and central sleep apnea.

How Do Philips Breathing Machines Cause Cancer?

The polyester-based polyurethane foam used in the recalled Philips breathing machines may degrade over time. This degradation may allow particles to flow into the affected CPAP, BiPAP, and ventilator air pathways, which then causes the person using the device to breathe in the particles. As Philips said in its clinical information, the “absence of visible particles does not mean that foam breakdown has not already begun.” This means that even if you can’t see foam degradation on your sleeping machine, you still may be inhaling toxic particles. Philips has already admitted the presence of the following:

  • Toluene Diamine: According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in animal studies, toluene-2,4-diamine was found to be a carcinogen following dietary administration. EPA noted a significant increase in the incidence of a many different tumor types, including liver, mammary gland, subcutaneous fibromas, lung lymphomas, and leukemia.
  • Toluene Diisocyanate (TDI): The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the gold standard for carcinogenicity testing, classifies TDI as a possible human carcinogen. IARC came to its conclusion based on sufficient evidence in experimental animals and inadequate evidence in humans. This study notes that TDI is a “well-known sensitizer and cause of occupational asthma.”
  • Diethylene Glycol: Associated with renal failure (acute kidney injury).
  • Dimethyl Diazene: Also known as azomethane. The oxide derivative of this compound is azoxymethane, a known carcinogen.
  • Phenol, 2,6-bis (1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-(1-methylpropyl): According to EPA, Phenol is considered toxic to humans via oral exposure. Anorexia, a dark coloration of the urine, diarrhea, progressive weight loss, salivation, vertigo, and blood and liver effects have been reported in chronically (long-term) exposed humans. Animal studies have shown reduced fetal body weights, growth retardation, and abnormal development in the offspring among animals exposed to phenol by the oral route.

Can I File a CPAP Lawsuit Against Philips?

If you were diagnosed with cancer after using one of the affected Philips recall products above, you may be eligible to pursue compensation in a CPAP lawsuit. The fastest way to find out more about your eligibility is to contact our firm as soon as you are able. Our legal team will evaluate your case and let you know if you can proceed with a claim.

If you are interested in learning more about pursuing a lawsuit against Philips, contact us today or call (855) 948-5098. Our class-action attorneys offer free and confidential CPAP lawsuit case evaluations.

  • Pilliod et al. v. Monsanto Co. $2 Billion
  • Dewayne “Lee” Johnson v. Monsanto Co. $289.2 Million
  • Pharmaceutical Settlement $105 Million
  • Hardeman v. Monsanto Co. $80 Million
  • Paxil Pediatric Class Action $63 Million
  • Third-Party Payer Class Action $40 Million
  • Defective Drug Class Action $28 Million
  • Whistleblower Settlement $18 Million

    $18 million settlement for Boeing government overcharging on aircraft maintenance

  • A Major US Plane Crash $17.5 Million
  • Commercial Truck Accident $15 Million

    $15 million settlement for a person gravely injured by a major truck company

  • Best Law Firms 2021
    Best Law Firms 2021

    The U.S. News – Best Lawyers® “Best Law Firms” rankings are based on lawyer evaluations, peer review from leading attorneys in their field, and review of additional information provided by law firms as part of the formal submission process.

  • National Trial Lawyers Top 100
    National Trial Lawyers Top 100

    The National Trial Lawyers Top 100 recognized the law firms of Baum Hedlund Aristei & Goldman, the Miller Firm and Audet & Partners with the 2019 Trial Team of the Year award (in the Mass Torts category) for their work in the groundbreaking case of Dewayne “Lee” Johnson v. Monsanto Company.

  • California Powerhouse
    California Powerhouse

    Law360 recognizes law firms that have a strong regional presence, working on important matters within their home state. “[Baum Hedlund] possesses a David v. Goliath-sized slingshot while seeking justice for everyday citizens it believes were harmed or killed through corporate wrongdoing.”

  • Elite Trial Lawyers
    Elite Trial Lawyers

    NLJ and American Lawyer Media honor law firms and attorneys as Elite Trial Lawyers for their cutting-edge legal work on behalf of plaintiffs in practice areas ranging from mass torts to securities litigation.

  • Listed in Best Lawyers
    Listed in Best Lawyers

    Best Lawyers is the oldest and most respected peer-review publication in the legal profession. A listing in Best Lawyers is widely regarded by both clients and legal professionals as a significant honor, conferred on a lawyer by his or her peers.

  • AV Top Ranked Law Firm
    AV Top Ranked Law Firm

    Less than one-half of one percent of firms across the nation have achieved this ranking. A firm must have a high percentage of lawyers who have achieved the prestigious AV® Preeminent rating by Martindale-Hubbell®.

  • Verdicts Hall of Fame
    Verdicts Hall of Fame

    The National Law Journal inducted Baum Hedlund into the Verdicts Hall of Fame for obtaining the $2 billion landmark verdict in the Roundup cancer case of Pilliod et al. v. Monsanto. The verdict was #1 in California and #2 in the U.S. in 2019 and is #9 in American history.

  • Super Lawyers
    Super Lawyers

    Super Lawyers is a rating service of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high-degree of peer recognition and professional achievement.

  • AV Preeminent Peer Review Rated
    AV Preeminent Peer Review Rated

    An AV® rating reflects an attorney who has reached the heights of professional excellence. The rating signifies the highest legal ability, and very high adherence to professional standards of conduct, ethics, reliability, and diligence.

  • Board Certified Attorneys
    Board Certified Attorneys

    The National Board of Trial Advocacy is one of the nation’s largest and oldest private board-certification organizations for attorneys. Two of our shareholders are certified in multiple specialties.

  • Top Jury Verdict in <br> CA and USA
    Top Jury Verdict in
    CA and USA

    TopVerdict.com ranks our $2 billion verdict in Pilliod et al. v. Monsanto as the biggest verdict in California and the second largest verdict in the U.S. in 2019. It is the ninth largest verdict in U.S. history.

  • Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers
    Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers

    Published annually, the Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers list recognizes the “best of the best” in this area of the law through nominations, research, and review by a board of their peers.

  • Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum
    Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum

    Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum is one of the most prestigious groups of trial lawyers in the United States.  Membership is limited to attorneys who have won million and multi-million-dollar verdicts and settlements.

  • Product Liability Practice Group of the Year
    Product Liability Practice Group of the Year

    In 2020, Law360 honored the law firms ”behind the litigation wins and major deals that resonated throughout the legal industry.” It recognized our success in several landmark cases.

  • Top Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California
    Top Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California

    In 2018, our $289 million Johnson v. Monsanto verdict was the largest personal injury verdict in California. TopVerdict.com also ranked it #2 among all verdicts in California and #10 in the nation.

  • Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers
    Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers

    The Bar Register is the definitive guide to the most distinguished law firms in America. It includes only those select law practices that have earned the highest rating in the Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory and have been designated by their colleagues as preeminent in their field.

/