.

Clay Robbins III

Attorney

Clay Robbins III 2018-10-05T15:18:21+00:00

Clay Robbins III: Attorney

Clay Robbins III is an attorney in the Los Angeles office of Baum, Hedlund, Aristei & Goldman. A third-generation California lawyer, Clay concentrates his practice on commercial transportation accident litigation and mass disasters.

For more the 35 years, Clay has championed the rights of victims and their families in personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits across the nation stemming from major accidents involving aviation, buses, trains, tractor-trailers and auto defects.

Prior to joining Baum, Hedlund, Aristei & Goldman, Clay was a partner at the Los Angeles law firm of Magaña, Cathcart & McCarthy for more than 20 years. He worked on many of the firms high profile catastrophic injury and wrongful death cases. Among the many cases he handled, he successfully represented the plaintiffs in an aviation insurance bad faith action resulting in the recovery of over $9 million in compensatory and punitive damages.

In a truck accident case, Clay successfully represented the heirs of a trucker who was killed in a highway accident involving another long-haul truck, obtaining a seven-figure resolution on behalf of his clients.

Clay also represented the interests of a young woman who suffered life changing injuries, including brain damage and hemiplegia, after her airbags failed to deploy when her vehicle was forced off the road and collided with a utility pole. An ensuing product liability case against the manufacturer of the airbag control module resulted in a multi- million-dollar verdict in favor of Clay’s client at trial, and then retained that judgment by successfully representing his client’s interests before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal.

Another transportation lawsuit against a major bus company and bus manufacturer resulted in Clay obtaining justice on behalf of passengers who sustained profound injuries in a devastating bus crash. The case concluded with a multi-million-dollar award for the represented parties.

Throughout his career, Clay has received numerous honors and awards, as well as the coveted peer review rating of A.V. Preeminent (the highest possible rating for preeminent legal ability and ethics) from Martindale Hubbell, the national directory of attorneys. He has also been appointed Judge Pro Tem by the Los Angeles County Superior Court.

In his free time, Clay enjoys traveling with his wife, Kimberly, spending time with his children and grandchildren, and running and fishing in the Pacific Northwest with his brother. Clay is also a diehard fan of UCLA athletics.

Education:

  • B.A., Psychology, University of California at Los Angeles, Dean’s List, 1978
  • J.D., Loyola University of Los Angeles, 1981

Court Admissions:

  • State Bar of California, 1981
  • United States District Court Central, 1982
  • Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, 1983
  • United States Supreme Court, 1988
  • United States District Court Northern, 1993
  • United States District Court Eastern, 2001
  • United States District Court Southern, 2003
  • AV® Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rating through LexisNexis Martindale Hubbell®
  • Listed, The Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers™
  • American Bar Association
  • Association of Trial Lawyers of America
  • Consumer Attorneys of California
  • Lawyer-Pilots Bar Association
  • Los Angeles County Bar Association
  • Loyola Law School Alumni
  • Member of the Ninth Circuit Historical Society
  • Attorneys Information Exchange Group
  • California Association for Nursing Home Reform
  • Supreme Court Historical Society
  • Los Angeles County Superior Court (2016-present)

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal

  • Twardowski v. Continental Airlines, 535 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 2008)
  • Montalvo v. Spirit Airlines, 508 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 2008)
  • Damon v. Air Pacific Ltd., 203 F.App’x 33 (9th Cir. 2006)
  • Cortez v. Air New Zealand, Ltd., 203 F.App’x 33 (9th Cir. 2006)
  • Blotteauz v. Qantas Airlines, 171 F.App’x 566 (9th Cir. 2006)
  • Caman v. Continental Airlines, 455 F.3d 1087 (9th Cir. 2006)
  • Rodriguez v. Ansett Australia, Ltd., 383 F.3d 914 (9th Cir. 2004)
  • Casteneda v. County of Los Angeles, 76 F.3d 385 (9th Cir. 1996)
  • Broadnax v. Municipal Court, 8 F.3d 25 (9th Cir. 1993)
  • McCalden v. California Library Assoc., 919 F.2d 538 (9th Cir. 1989)
  • Haddad v. Lockheed, 720 F.2d 1454 (9th Cir. 1983)

California Supreme Court

  • Winn, et al., v. Pioneer Medical Group (2016) 63 Cal. 4th 148
  • Dore v. Arnold World Wide, Inc. (2006) 39 Cal.4th 384

California Courts of Appeal

  • Mancuso v. So. Cal. Edison (1991) 232 Cal.App.3d 88
  • Mannino v. Superior Court (1983) 142 Cal.App.3d 776