Government Healthcare Fraud

Government-Healthcare-Fraud-whistleblowers-lawfirm

Health care fraud against the United States occurs when an individual or corporation files a claim to obtain reimbursement from the government for healthcare products or services under false pretenses. The two most visible programs vulnerable to healthcare fraud are Medicare, the government program that serves people age 65 and older, and Medicaid, which covers people with low incomes.

Tricare, a government program that provides military personnel with civilian healthcare benefits, is also a victim of false claims and fraudulent activity. Tricare enrollment is open to active service members and their families, National Guard and Reserve members, and retirees. The United States Department of Defense Military Health System administers Tricare, although the government has contracts with several large private insurance corporations to provide claims processing, administrative functions and customer service.

Baum, Hedlund, Aristei & Goldman Announces that NeuroScience / Pharmasan Labs Pays $8.5 Million to Settle Whistleblower Lawsuit

Types of Healthcare Fraud Schemes

Fraud can be found in all parts of the nation’s healthcare system, including medical clinics, hospitals, nursing homes, residential care facilities, and home healthcare companies.

Some of the most common schemes used to defraud government healthcare programs include:

  • Billing for products or services that were never provided.
  • Billing for medically unnecessary services.
  • Billing for excessive services, e.g., daily medical office visits when a few times monthly would be sufficient.
  • Overcharging for the goods and services that were provided. Two of the most common schemes are:
    • Upcoding of services or supplies: Each medical procedure has a corresponding billing code attached to it. A criminal provider might submit a bill using a procedure code that will give them a higher payment instead of the actual code for the service provided, for example, using a code for individual therapy, when group therapy was provided. Upcoding may also apply to supplies – e.g., billing for more expensive items when cheaper ones were provided.
    • Unbundling: This involves submitting separate bills for tests or procedures that were performed at the same time and should have been billed together at a reduced cost.
  • Paying kickbacks in exchange for the referral of patients for health care services.
  • Durable Medical Equipment (DME) fraud: Wheelchairs, catheters, and home oxygen or insulin pumps are examples of the many types of DME. Schemes include upcoding and unbundling (submitting multiple bills for component parts), billing for more expensive items than were actually provided, shipping DME without proper medical authorization, shipping DME that was never ordered, and failing to credit Medicare for returned items.

Healthcare Fraud and the Whistleblower

Healthcare fraud is prosecutable both criminally and civilly under the federal False Claims Act (FCA), which rewards and protects whistleblowers who file whistleblower (qui tam) lawsuits against fraudulent providers.

Recent settlements announced by the Department of Justice (DOJ) show how common and costly Medicare and Medicaid fraud is in the United States. They also illustrate the important role that whistleblowers, the FCA, and whistleblower litigation play in exposing fraud and helping the government recover fraudulently obtained payments. Here are a few examples:

  • December 1, 2014 – North Atlantic Medical Services Inc. (NAMS), a Massachusetts company, agreed to pay $852,378 to resolve allegations that it violated the False Claims Act by submitting claims to Medicare and Medicaid for respiratory services provided by unlicensed personnel. The government investigation was triggered by a whistleblower lawsuit filed under the FCA by two former NAMS employees. They will split a whistleblower award of $153,428
  • November 18, 2014 – The DOJ announced that the former chief operating officer of a Miami-area psychiatric hospital had pled guilty to submitting more than $67 million in fraudulent claims to Medicare for inpatient and outpatient mental health services that were not medically necessary. The hospital obtained Medicare patients by paying bribes and kickbacks to patient brokers.
  • October 22, 2014 – In one of the largest recent fraud settlements, DaVita Healthcare Partners, Inc., a company that operates dialysis clinics in 46 states and the District of Columbia, paid $350 million to resolve claims that it violated the False Claims Act by paying kickbacks to physicians for referring patients to its clinics. Such payments have been made illegal to ensure that health care decisions are based only on the medical needs and interests of the patient, not financial gain for the doctor. Here again, the charges were originally brought in a qui tam lawsuit filed by a whistleblower, a senior financial analyst with the company. His award for pursuing whistleblower litigation will likely exceed $50 million.
  • October 30, 2014 – Dignity Health, one of the largest hospital systems in the nation, agreed to pay $37 million to settle charges that 13 of its hospitals in California, Nevada and Arizona knowingly submitted false claims to Medicare and Tricare by admitting patients who could have been treated on a less costly, outpatient basis. The settlement resolved a lawsuit brought by a whistleblower who was former Dignity employee under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act (FCA). She will receive a whistleblower award of approximately $6.25 million.

Using the False Claims Act to Fight Healthcare Fraud

As mentioned earlier, whistleblowers who have knowledge of fraudulent practices in the healthcare industry can take action on behalf of the U.S. government by using the False Claims Act (FCA). The FCA allows a whistleblower to file what is known as a qui tam lawsuit against an individual or business that is engaged in fraudulent practices. The Department of Justice, which prosecutes FCA actions, is notified of the lawsuit and may at some point decide to intervene in the case. If the action results in a settlement or successful trial, the whistleblower is entitled to receive 15 percent to 25 percent of the amount recovered.

It is important that anyone seeking to file a qui tam lawsuit receive expert legal assistance. Experienced attorneys can protect your rights and give you the best chance of a successful outcome. They can ensure that FCA rules are followed in filing the suit and can maximize the size of the award the whistleblower receives. If you have knowledge of healthcare fraud and are considering taking action, please contact the Baum, Hedlund, Aristei and Goldman whistleblower team.

Please allow a few moments after submitting this form. You will be notified when your information is received.