Glyphosate Based Herbicide

Researchers Find “Compelling Link” Between Roundup Exposure and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Link Between Roundup Cases and Non Hodgkin LymphomaIn this 2019 study, researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, University of Washington and the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, reported what they call a “compelling link” between exposure to a glyphosate-based herbicide (GBH) like Roundup and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

The scientists, led by Luoping Zhang of the UC Berkeley School of Public Health, combined data from several previous studies of GBH exposure in an analytical process known as meta-analysis. Meta-analysis increases the number of subjects being studied and thereby enhances the ability of the research to detect an effect that might otherwise remain hidden or unclear. The investigators concluded that exposure to a glyphosate-based herbicide increases the risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma by 41%.

Zhang’s study was unique in that she and her colleagues focused on individuals in each study who were reported to have had the highest exposure to GBHs. Higher and longer exposures, they reasoned, would be more likely to reveal the true risk of GBH-associated NHL.

This is particularly true, they noted, in a world where most people have been exposed to glyphosate directly or indirectly. The reason is relatively simple: to determine if a substance has negative health consequences, scientists need to compare those exposed to the substance with a control group of individuals not exposed. But where do you find that control group if everyone is exposed?

Contact Us

  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter the age of the patient.
  • Please enter the age of the patient.
  • Please enter your symptoms.
  • Please describe your experience.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please enter your primary phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your city.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter your zip code.
    This isn't a valid zip cide.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Hardeman v. Monsanto Co. $80 Million
  • Dewayne “Lee” Johnson v. Monsanto Co. $289.2 Million
  • Pilliod et al. v. Monsanto Co. $2 Billion
  • Best Law Firms 2021
    Best Law Firms 2021

    The U.S. News – Best Lawyers® “Best Law Firms” rankings are based on lawyer evaluations, peer review from leading attorneys in their field, and review of additional information provided by law firms as part of the formal submission process.

  • National Trial Lawyers Top 100
    National Trial Lawyers Top 100

    The National Trial Lawyers Top 100 recognized the law firms of Baum Hedlund Aristei & Goldman, the Miller Firm and Audet & Partners with the 2019 Trial Team of the Year award (in the Mass Torts category) for their work in the groundbreaking case of Dewayne “Lee” Johnson v. Monsanto Company.

  • California Powerhouse
    California Powerhouse

    Law360 recognizes law firms that have a strong regional presence, working on important matters within their home state. “[Baum Hedlund] possesses a David v. Goliath-sized slingshot while seeking justice for everyday citizens it believes were harmed or killed through corporate wrongdoing.”

  • Elite Trial Lawyers
    Elite Trial Lawyers

    NLJ and American Lawyer Media honor law firms and attorneys as Elite Trial Lawyers for their cutting-edge legal work on behalf of plaintiffs in practice areas ranging from mass torts to securities litigation.

  • Listed in Best Lawyers
    Listed in Best Lawyers

    Best Lawyers is the oldest and most respected peer-review publication in the legal profession. A listing in Best Lawyers is widely regarded by both clients and legal professionals as a significant honor, conferred on a lawyer by his or her peers.

  • AV Top Ranked Law Firm
    AV Top Ranked Law Firm

    Less than one-half of one percent of firms across the nation have achieved this ranking. A firm must have a high percentage of lawyers who have achieved the prestigious AV® Preeminent rating by Martindale-Hubbell®.

  • Verdicts Hall of Fame
    Verdicts Hall of Fame

    The National Law Journal inducted Baum Hedlund into the Verdicts Hall of Fame for obtaining the $2 billion landmark verdict in the Roundup cancer case of Pilliod et al. v. Monsanto. The verdict was #1 in California and #2 in the U.S. in 2019 and is #9 in American history.

  • Super Lawyers
    Super Lawyers

    Super Lawyers is a rating service of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high-degree of peer recognition and professional achievement.

  • AV Preeminent Peer Review Rated
    AV Preeminent Peer Review Rated

    An AV® rating reflects an attorney who has reached the heights of professional excellence. The rating signifies the highest legal ability, and very high adherence to professional standards of conduct, ethics, reliability, and diligence.

  • Board Certified Attorneys
    Board Certified Attorneys

    The National Board of Trial Advocacy is one of the nation’s largest and oldest private board-certification organizations for attorneys. Two of our shareholders are certified in multiple specialties.

  • Top Jury Verdict in <br> CA and USA
    Top Jury Verdict in
    CA and USA

    TopVerdict.com ranks our $2 billion verdict in Pilliod et al. v. Monsanto as the biggest verdict in California and the second largest verdict in the U.S. in 2019. It is the ninth largest verdict in U.S. history.

  • Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers
    Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers

    Published annually, the Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers list recognizes the “best of the best” in this area of the law through nominations, research, and review by a board of their peers.

  • Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum
    Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum

    Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum is one of the most prestigious groups of trial lawyers in the United States.  Membership is limited to attorneys who have won million and multi-million-dollar verdicts and settlements.

  • Product Liability Practice Group of the Year
    Product Liability Practice Group of the Year

    In 2020, Law360 honored the law firms ”behind the litigation wins and major deals that resonated throughout the legal industry.” It recognized our success in several landmark cases.

  • Top Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California
    Top Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California

    In 2018, our $289 million Johnson v. Monsanto verdict was the largest personal injury verdict in California. TopVerdict.com also ranked it #2 among all verdicts in California and #10 in the nation.

  • Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers
    Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers

    The Bar Register is the definitive guide to the most distinguished law firms in America. It includes only those select law practices that have earned the highest rating in the Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory and have been designated by their colleagues as preeminent in their field.

/

The AHS was a cohort study. In cohort studies, individuals exposed to a substance thought to increase disease risk and a related group of people not exposed to the risk factor are followed for a defined period of time. Researchers then determine if the incidence of the disease was greater in the exposed group.

In the AHS, the exposed group consisted of licensed pesticide applicators who were enrolled in the study from 1993 – 1997. A 2005 study based on the AHS results found no statistically significant link between glyphosate exposure. A second study published in 2018, which followed some subjects up to 2013, also reported no link between glyphosate-based herbicide and cancer. Indeed, the second study suggested that GBHs decreased the risk of NHL.

However, several well-respected scientists—including scientists at Monsanto and one of the authors of the original 2005 AHS study (Aaron Blair, who worked for the National Cancer Institute at the time)—said the AHS study was fundamentally flawed due to non-differential exposure misclassification. Non-differential exposure misclassification occurs when individuals who have been exposed to the toxin being studied, in this case GBHs, are misclassified as non-exposed – or the reverse, non-exposed subjects being classified as exposed. Those who acquire the disease being studied and those who do not may both be misclassified. Non-differential exposure misclassification will bias the results of a study in the direction of no effect. It will appear that there is no association, even if one exists. In her testimony during the Pilliod trial, Dr. Beate Ritz, chair of the Department of Epidemiology at UCLA, provided detailed analysis of the problems with the Agricultural Health Study (beginning on pdf p. 100 of the Day 5 transcript.)

The Zhang study, by combining data from multiple studies, including the AHS, but focusing on the high-exposure groups, revealed the association that was obscured by the exposure misclassification of the AHS study.

Zhang’s results are supported by a new French study, published in March 2019 in the International Journal of Epidemiology. This study of multiple pesticides (herbicides like Roundup are categorized within the pesticide group) pooled data from three large cohort studies of agricultural workers, the AHS and two other studies, one in France and one in Norway. The authors of this study did not attempt to identify different levels of exposure. Exposure was categorized as either exposed or never exposed. In addition, pesticide use among the Norwegian and French cohorts (63% and 68 % respectively) was much lower than the AHS cohort (99%). Nevertheless, while not finding an association between glyphosate and NHL, authors report a statistically significant association between any exposure to glyphosate and risk for the most common type of NHL— diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Glyphosate increased the risk by 36%. Out of 14 pesticides and 33 active ingredients analyzed by the French investigators, glyphosate was the only one to show a statistically significant association with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

The Zhang study also reviewed the results of animal studies and mechanistic studies. Four of six studies of malignant lymphomas in mice reported statistically significant associations with glyphosate exposure. The authors note that the mice in these studies were not exposed to the full glyphosate-based herbicide, which includes additives that have been reported to make the full formulation more toxic than simple glyphosate. Zhang discusses several mechanisms that are believed to be the means by which GBHs exert their carcinogenic effects. These include suppression of the immune system, disruption of the endocrine system, genetic alterations (DNA damage), and oxidative stress.

“Generally speaking, these mechanisms, among others, provide evidence of biological plausibility for the observed link between glyphosate exposure and human NHL, though further work is needed to better understand these factors.” — Lupoing Zhang & colleagues, 2019 meta-analysis.

It is noteworthy that Zhang and two other members of her team, Emanuela Taioli and Lianne Sheppard, served as Science Review Board Members for the US Environmental Protection Agency’s FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) Scientific Advisory Panel that evaluated glyphosate in December 2016.

Summary Information

Title
Exposure to glyphosate-based herbicides and risk for non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A meta-analysis and supporting evidence

Authors
Luoping Zhang1, Iemaan Rana1, Rachel M. Shaffer2, Emanuela Taioli3, Lianne Sheppard2,4

  1. Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, USA.
  2. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, USA.
  3. Institute for Translational Epidemiology and Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
  4. Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, USA

Journal
Mutation Research-Reviews in Mutation Research 781 (2019), 186-206

Funding
R.M.S. was supported by National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) award T32ES015459 and the University of Washington Retirement Association Aging Fellowship.

Firm Reviews

What Our Clients Are Saying
  • I Can’t Imagine a Better Law Firm

    “Multiple lawyers recommended Baum Hedlund to me and I have been consistently impressed with the quality of their work.”

    - Best Law Firms Survey
  • They Are About Changing the Systems...

    “Baum Hedlund are not only amazing attorneys but more importantly, they are activists. They are about changing the systems which got us into trouble in the first place. They understand their role in the process of making change.”

    - Kim Witczak
  • Top Legal Minds in the Country

    “The Baum, Hedlund firm has some of the top legal minds in the country; they are driven, determined, trustworthy, ethical and passionate.”

    - From Best Lawyers® Best Law Firms
  • Diligent & Professional Representation

    “Thanks to your efforts I was able to recover from a tragic experience and turn my life around for the best.”

    - W.T.
  • Our Best Interest Was Always Number One on Your List

    “A special thank you to your Spanish-speaking staff for the extra effort put into this case. The language barrier was never a problem, and we are so very thankful to them. Your name holds much respect in our family.”

    - G.C. & C.C
/