Paxil Suicide Lawsuit

Paxil Suicide Lawsuits

We are no longer accepting new Paxil cases

Paxil (generic name paroxetine hydrochloride) is an SSRI antidepressant that is commonly taken to treat depression and anxiety disorders, but both the brand name and generic versions have a serious potential side effect: In some cases, victims may be more likely to commit suicide or homicide while taking Paxil. Our attorneys at Baum Hedlund are currently investigating Paxil suicide cases on behalf of families whose loved ones have taken their life while on Paxil, as well as patients who have attempted suicide while taking a form of Paxil.

If you or someone you know was seriously injured or took their life after taking Paxil or generic Paxil, we encourage you to contact our award-winning firm right away. With over $4 billion won for our clients over the last 40 years and some of the largest settlements and verdicts in antidepressant litigation history, our firm has shown that it can successfully advocate for victims and fight to change the pharmaceutical industry for the future.

Contact Us

  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter the age of the patient.
  • Please enter the age of the patient.
  • Please enter your symptoms.
  • Please describe your experience.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please enter your primary phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your city.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter your zip code.
    This isn't a valid zip cide.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Pharmaceutical Settlement $105 Million
  • Paxil Pediatric Class Action $63 Million
  • Third-Party Payer Class Action $40 Million
  • Defective Drug Class Action $28 Million
  • Celexa-Lexapro Pediatric Class Action $10 Million
  • Drug Injury $9 Million
  • Best Law Firms 2021
    Best Law Firms 2021

    The U.S. News – Best Lawyers® “Best Law Firms” rankings are based on lawyer evaluations, peer review from leading attorneys in their field, and review of additional information provided by law firms as part of the formal submission process.

  • National Trial Lawyers Top 100
    National Trial Lawyers Top 100

    The National Trial Lawyers Top 100 recognized the law firms of Baum Hedlund Aristei & Goldman, the Miller Firm and Audet & Partners with the 2019 Trial Team of the Year award (in the Mass Torts category) for their work in the groundbreaking case of Dewayne “Lee” Johnson v. Monsanto Company.

  • California Powerhouse
    California Powerhouse

    Law360 recognizes law firms that have a strong regional presence, working on important matters within their home state. “[Baum Hedlund] possesses a David v. Goliath-sized slingshot while seeking justice for everyday citizens it believes were harmed or killed through corporate wrongdoing.”

  • Elite Trial Lawyers
    Elite Trial Lawyers

    NLJ and American Lawyer Media honor law firms and attorneys as Elite Trial Lawyers for their cutting-edge legal work on behalf of plaintiffs in practice areas ranging from mass torts to securities litigation.

  • Listed in Best Lawyers
    Listed in Best Lawyers

    Best Lawyers is the oldest and most respected peer-review publication in the legal profession. A listing in Best Lawyers is widely regarded by both clients and legal professionals as a significant honor, conferred on a lawyer by his or her peers.

  • AV Top Ranked Law Firm
    AV Top Ranked Law Firm

    Less than one-half of one percent of firms across the nation have achieved this ranking. A firm must have a high percentage of lawyers who have achieved the prestigious AV® Preeminent rating by Martindale-Hubbell®.

  • Verdicts Hall of Fame
    Verdicts Hall of Fame

    The National Law Journal inducted Baum Hedlund into the Verdicts Hall of Fame for obtaining the $2 billion landmark verdict in the Roundup cancer case of Pilliod et al. v. Monsanto. The verdict was #1 in California and #2 in the U.S. in 2019 and is #9 in American history.

  • Super Lawyers
    Super Lawyers

    Super Lawyers is a rating service of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high-degree of peer recognition and professional achievement.

  • AV Preeminent Peer Review Rated
    AV Preeminent Peer Review Rated

    An AV® rating reflects an attorney who has reached the heights of professional excellence. The rating signifies the highest legal ability, and very high adherence to professional standards of conduct, ethics, reliability, and diligence.

  • Board Certified Attorneys
    Board Certified Attorneys

    The National Board of Trial Advocacy is one of the nation’s largest and oldest private board-certification organizations for attorneys. Two of our shareholders are certified in multiple specialties.

  • Top Jury Verdict in <br> CA and USA
    Top Jury Verdict in
    CA and USA ranks our $2 billion verdict in Pilliod et al. v. Monsanto as the biggest verdict in California and the second largest verdict in the U.S. in 2019. It is the ninth largest verdict in U.S. history.

  • Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers
    Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers

    Published annually, the Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers list recognizes the “best of the best” in this area of the law through nominations, research, and review by a board of their peers.

  • Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum
    Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum

    Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum is one of the most prestigious groups of trial lawyers in the United States.  Membership is limited to attorneys who have won million and multi-million-dollar verdicts and settlements.

  • Product Liability Practice Group of the Year
    Product Liability Practice Group of the Year

    In 2020, Law360 honored the law firms ”behind the litigation wins and major deals that resonated throughout the legal industry.” It recognized our success in several landmark cases.

  • Top Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California
    Top Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California

    In 2018, our $289 million Johnson v. Monsanto verdict was the largest personal injury verdict in California. also ranked it #2 among all verdicts in California and #10 in the nation.

  • Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers
    Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers

    The Bar Register is the definitive guide to the most distinguished law firms in America. It includes only those select law practices that have earned the highest rating in the Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory and have been designated by their colleagues as preeminent in their field.


A Brief Overview of Paxil Suicide Lawsuits

On April 20, 2017, a jury in Illinois awarded $3 million to Wendy Dolin, the widow of 57-year-old Stewart Dolin, who committed suicide only six days after he started taking a generic form of the antidepressant Paxil. Our attorneys at Baum Hedlund Aristei & Goldman were proud to represent Wendy Dolin in her landmark case against GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), the original manufacturer of Paxil that brought the drug to market in 1992. In the end, the Dolin paroxetine lawsuit returned a verdict worth $3 million and sent a clear message to generic drug makers: You will be held accountable if you fail to warn consumers about dangerous side effects.

The most persuasive evidence introduced during the Dolin trial came directly from GlaxoSmithKline. During the case, jurors heard from Dr. David Ross, who worked for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for 10 years reviewing new drug applications submitted to the agency by pharmaceutical companies. Dr. Ross testified about a suicide report on Paxil that GSK submitted to the FDA in 1991 following the Paxil clinical trials. According to his testimony, GSK’s report on Paxil side effects misrepresented the suicide data collected during clinical trials.

Specifically, GSK reported a higher number of suicides and suicide attempts in the placebo group than actually took place during the trials. GSK also reported a lower number of suicide attempts in the paroxetine group. These alterations made it appear as though those who took paroxetine faced about the same risk of suicide and suicidal behavior as those who took a placebo.

Some other findings unearthed during the trial:

  • Evidence of positive bias in publications: In 1995, psychiatrists and employees working for the original incarnation of GSK published a paper in the journal European Neuropsychopharmacology which asserted that paroxetine reduced suicides and suicide attempts. The company encouraged its salesforce to use this article when talking to physicians in order to allay concerns about suicide risks.
  • Increased suicide risk confirmed again by GSK: The increased risk was confirmed in 2006 by GSK’s internal analysis of its own suicide data. Patients taking Paxil were nearly seven times more likely to attempt suicide than those on placebo.
  • FDA analysis reveals troubling risks: That same year, an FDA analysis of select clinical trials involving adults found that taking Paxil resulted in 2.7 times the risk of suicidal behavior compared to placebo for all indications. Dr. Russell Katz, the FDA’s Director of Neurological Products, explained during an FDA Advisory Committee Meeting in 2006 that statistically significant findings such as this are “operationally defined as causality.”

In short, by the end of 2006, a clear picture had emerged: Taking Paxil can cause older adults, as well as children and young adults, to experience dangerous Paxil or paroxetine side effects, including suicidal behavior. “Glaxo has known for two decades that Paxil can cause people of all ages to commit suicide. The company not only hid the risk, but stuck its head in the sand and ignored countless suicides that occurred in its clinical trials,” says Michael Baum, senior managing shareholder of Baum Hedlund, about the litigation.

All antidepressants, like Paxil and generic paroxetine, already carry a “black box” warning on the label, stating that these drugs can increase the risk of suicidal ideation and behavior in children, adolescents, and young adults up to the age of 24. However, by failing to provide accurate warnings about the risks and include those older than 25, GSK and its successor Apotex may have caused many people to attempt suicide or lose a loved one to suicide.

Can Paxil Really Cause Someone to Commit Suicide?

Because Paxil is prescribed to people diagnosed with a wide range of mental and emotional difficulties, including depression or anxiety, many have wondered how it is possible to blame drug defects for suicide attempts. People damaged by defective antidepressants – or those who have seen their loved ones commit suicide or harm themselves while taking antidepressants – might well think that “mental illness” was solely to blame.

Jurors in the Dolin trial no doubt considered the same possibility. Nevertheless, after five weeks of testimony from psychiatrists and experts in pharmacology, the jurors were convinced that the current body of research and medical science pertaining to antidepressants, Paxil, and suicide proved the drug was to blame. Generic Paxil—paroxetine—can cause someone over 24 to take his, or her, life.

Suicidal Behavior on Paroxetine: “Emotional Blunting” and Self-Harm

Another Paxil side effect known to increase the risk of suicide is emotional blunting. This is also a well-recognized side effect of drugs in Paxil’s class, one that others have referred to as apathy or emotional indifference. Psychiatrist and psychotherapist Dr. David Healy told the jurors in the Dolin trial that emotional blunting, combined with a painful condition called akathisia, can lead to a mental state in which an individual has thoughts of harming themselves or others, but is “numbed” to the consequences of their actions. Drugs in the Paxil class can also cause someone to “go psychotic, become delirious,” Dr. Healy explained.

According to Dr. Healy’s testimony during the Dolin trial, when SSRIs came onto the market, scientists noticed early on that those who harmed themselves while taking the drugs did so in particularly violent ways. During our research and investigation as leading litigators, we identified 22 individuals who committed suicide during the Paxil clinical trials. Sixteen of the suicides were violent in nature, including multiple suicides using firearms.

“One of the things that struck people fairly early on with the effects of these pills was that the nature, the way people harmed themselves, often seemed to be disproportionately violent,” said Healy.

Who Is Liable for Your Losses?

Of course, GSK is no longer solely responsible for Paxil suicide victims and their losses. In January of 2014, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), the original developer and maker of Paxil, transferred full responsibility for Paxil to Apotex. Although Apotex did not create the drug, the company now manufactures Paxil and generic paroxetine, and thus Apotex is responsible for the content of the paroxetine label and advertising campaigns.

Just as GSK was brought to justice for failing to warn consumers about dangerous Paxil side effects, so should the current manufacturer Apotex, Canada’s largest drug company and one of the largest generic drug manufacturers in the world. The Canadian pharmaceutical company manufactures more than 300 different pharmaceuticals, including Paxil. Unfortunately, to this day, the Paxil/paroxetine label still fails to warn adults over age 24 of the increased risk of suicide—a risk that Apotex should know all too well. This is why on September 1, 2017, Baum Hedlund sent a letter to Apotex, the current manufacturer of Paxil and paroxetine, putting the company on notice that the Paxil label is inadequate.

Why Apotex Should Change the Generic Paxil Label

The current Paxil/paroxetine label is scientifically, ethically, and legally indefensible. The drug’s label does not warn physicians or consumers about the risk of suicide for adults over the age of 24.

Paxil Label with highlighted text that was misleadingInstead, doctors and patients in their care are dangerously misled in two ways:

  • They are led to believe the risk of suicide does not extend beyond age 24.
  • They are led to believe known Paxil side effects are just symptoms of an alleged illness.
  • All of this puts patients and doctors in a very dangerous position.

To challenge this unethical label, our attorneys at Baum Hedlund sent a letter to Apotex in 2017, requesting that the company take “swift action” to “remedy the deficiencies in the Paxil label,” so that it warns of the increased risk of adult suicidal behavior related to taking Paxil and paroxetine. Failure to act would send a message that Apotex is willing to sacrifice public safety in pursuit of its own financial gain.

How Do I File a Generic Paxil Suicide Lawsuit?

GSK and Apotex have both been aware of the suicide risks that come with Paxil for many years. Although the current label now warns of the risk in children and young adults, it still does not warn the public of the risk in older adults. If you or someone you care about has been harmed by generic Paxil, we hope this page provided you with information that helps explain how and why that can happen.

Our Los Angeles trial lawyers at Baum Hedlund Aristei & Goldman have represented thousands of victims who have been harmed by dangerous pharmaceutical drugs, including Paxil. We filed our first Paxil suicide lawsuits against GSK in the early 2000s and our firm was appointed lead counsel representing thousands of Paxil victims from across the United States in multidistrict litigation. We have seen the harm antidepressants can cause and the extent to which drug companies will go to protect their enormously profitable, and our team has accumulated a considerable body of evidence demonstrating that Paxil is associated with an increased risk of suicidal behavior in all age groups – not just children and young adults.

This experience has made us one of the most experienced and knowledgeable firms in the nation in bringing major pharmaceutical companies, including GlaxoSmithKline and other makers of SSRI antidepressants, to justice. When you contact us about a claim, our attorneys will review the circumstances and determine if you are eligible to seek compensation by filing a Paxil suicide lawsuit. During your free case consultation, please feel free to ask any questions or raise concerns you may have about the process of filing a Paxil suicide lawsuit. We are here to help.

Firm Reviews

What Our Clients Are Saying
  • I Can’t Imagine a Better Law Firm

    “Multiple lawyers recommended Baum Hedlund to me and I have been consistently impressed with the quality of their work.”

    - Best Law Firms Survey
  • They Are About Changing the Systems...

    “Baum Hedlund are not only amazing attorneys but more importantly, they are activists. They are about changing the systems which got us into trouble in the first place. They understand their role in the process of making change.”

    - Kim Witczak
  • Top Legal Minds in the Country

    “The Baum, Hedlund firm has some of the top legal minds in the country; they are driven, determined, trustworthy, ethical and passionate.”

    - From Best Lawyers® Best Law Firms
  • Diligent & Professional Representation

    “Thanks to your efforts I was able to recover from a tragic experience and turn my life around for the best.”

    - W.T.
  • Our Best Interest Was Always Number One on Your List

    “A special thank you to your Spanish-speaking staff for the extra effort put into this case. The language barrier was never a problem, and we are so very thankful to them. Your name holds much respect in our family.”

    - G.C. & C.C